Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:23

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Have you ever answered your door in lingerie?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Who’s the smartest Hollywood celebrity?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Procter & Gamble says it will cut 7,000 jobs over the next 2 years - CBS News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
My son got caught peeing on a carpet in his room and he is 12 years old. What should I do?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is the scariest thing that ever happened in your life?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Haunting Image Shows The Moon Deimos From The Surface of Mars - ScienceAlert
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Latest WA shipping and tourism numbers tell a depressing story - The Seattle Times